The difference between a real plot and boasting a conspiracy is simple: if the newspaper is a real conspiracy, if he writes Rebirth is yet another shot. On other occasions we had to defend the reasons for the Milan daily for certain analysis policies in which he was denounced in the longa arm of U.S. foreign policy in national politics. Analysis is correct, all right, but not substantiated. Il Giornale, in fact, you can - while laudable initiative - such blows theater mainly to protect the interests of their own "shop" policy and not, as it must, in conjunction with a critique of the Western model itself, which indeed is taken as a model. A further proof of the ruthlessness that distinguishes the political analysis of National Socialist anti-Western, must go beyond the limits of public decency and even defend the positions taken by the most servile of alpha Atlanticism contemporary mr. Frattini Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs of the Republic this wavering.
To order: the practice of imperialist meddling in Washington against third countries is not always the same type, by mode and intensity. The factors that determine the dosage strength may be geographic (what can be done in Latin America or the Near East - the death squads, for example - are difficult to import into the crisis in Western Europe) or historical ( some operating methods as possible in 1970 do not fit the twenty-first century, for example), or simply dictated by the strength or level of "dangerousness" the enemy to be killed or removed. Craxi, for example, was not Allende, Craxi and Berlusconi is not: a change of course are the historical and geographical context (Chile seventies, eighties and Italy of the new millennium), but also the caliber of management of public affairs in an anti-western of the three characters in question.
Allende had succeeded in institutionalizing the reconversion of an advanced socialist socioeconomic system in an important country in the "yard" in North America, and his did not stop deposing before the use of all means drastic and solving of which were in possession: bombed the presidential palace and rounded up and killed thousands of opponents in the most barbaric way. Craxi, however, in a country firmly in American hands, although not properly fielded socialistically relevant social and economic reforms, has allowed the unspeakable affront to show off for what was nominally a sovereign should be the norm: the defense of its sovereignty, not only that: after Sigonella and after the support given to the needs of the struggle for the liberation of Palestine, broke the taboo of the most shameful, culturally and politically legitimizing the natural link between socialism and national element, which was - in its sense craxiana - happily defined as "socialism tricolor". As the representative of a political class potentially harmful to the designs of Washington for Europe because, although mild supporter of a sort of non-alignment which sometimes turned into impetus commendable research of sovereignty, his killing went through a maneuver-moralizing judicial decision-making centers of oltreatlantico orchestrated by the judiciary as a deftly-directed and incited a plaza paved the way for the bipolar turn-American national politics. Asking forgiveness for the sacrilegious approach, we then current president of the Council of Ministers, Silvio Berlusconi. The government led by these over the last sixteen years are marked by a blind adherence to the address of the U.S. political and big business stateless person, both in terms of domestic policy (destruction of the welfare state, abolition of employment protection, disposal of public property) and foreign policy (support for crime policies of Zionism, military participation in colonial enterprises in Asia). However, it is likely that some attitudes of the center-right government have been considered in Washington with some annoyance: the politics of proximity with Russia post-elciniana, for example, or non-foreclosure of relations with the Arab-Mediterranean world, or although still limited to the contrast migration (the bearers of further disintegration of the sphere of identity and national labor) and maintaining margins of public ownership of certain parts of the strategic sector. There are still elements to determine whether the U.S. is actually aimed at a regime-change, as in software version, but the fact is that the warning signs were launched. Better a dragon, or a perfume, a technocrat or any that would set Rome on the tracks of more complete servility, a sort of Mediterranean Poland.
The fact remains that it is still a friendly government, and even the halls of power by the U.S. only want to adjust the shot. And the fact remains that when in Rome ne sono accorti, tanto che qualcuno ha alzato la voce: lo ha fatto il filogovernativo Il Giornale, che ha clamorosamente citato i precedenti della “rivoluzione arancione” a Kiev o le manovre speculative sulla lira del 1992; si è fatto sentire anche Frattini, il cui atteggiamento nei confronti degli Stati Uniti è tale che quello del ragionier Fantozzi verso il megadirettore, al confronto, sembra rievocare le gesta di Spartaco. Tutti a parlare di un complotto, insomma, che assume sempre più le sembianze di un regolamento di conti interno all’atlantismo che sembra evolversi in favore della fazione “sinistra” e della finanza laica ai danni della fazione concorrente “capitalista-nazionale” e berlusconiana.
From the frying pan into the fire, all right. But - given that the discomfort is still larger by the vision of many men "culturally similar" rally around the Court of the PDL as if you were to defend La Moneda hordes Yankee - back to Frattini. Commenting on the "news" spread by the website Wikileaks, which would be confidential communications in the U.S. which the U.S. government has complained of Berlusconi because of his Russian-Libyan relations, he said, our own, a theory worthy of consideration "will be the ' September 11 of diplomacy. "
And it is this: come è vero che l’undici settembre del 2001 ha avuto luogo un auto-attentato (fatto evidente a chiunque abbia frequentato almeno le lezioni di educazione tecnica alla scuola media) finalizzato al conseguimento di obiettivi politici internazionali, così le “rivelazioni” di Wikileaks assomigliano sempre più a un auto-scandalo con cui gli Stati Uniti (i cui apparati di sicurezza è sì sbagliato sopravvalutare, ma che non si possono considerare neanche così inetti dal “perdere” tutti i documenti catalogati come riservatissimi relativi a interi anni) vogliono solo far passare dei messaggi. A Berlusconi e non solo.
Perché in linea di massima, in quel dell’Atlantico North, it's just what they want to pass the censorship that goes: sometimes to warn, sometimes to deter, to scare at times, sometimes to misinform; always to give the appearance of the crisis of the West a melodrama, hiding his true nature of tragedy.
0 comments:
Post a Comment