Wikileaks entitled to enter into the history of journalism with a scoop which marks the Italian history and world . Thanks to the site of intelligence we know that our Prime The council did a little partying 'very wild indeed. Thanks America.
So the expected secret documents that were disclosed to Wikileaks does not reveal anything that you do not already know or at least it was thought (for example, that always our prime minister is a "feckless"). But if the news about Berlusconi do nothing but record the gossip and the news last year, the lack of news about the news even more serious. This is true for Iran, for Guantanamo, for the sale of weapons. Tough news, but no - repeat, at least so far - amazing news. Just read Republic, with its obsession with the private-public life of the Knight for the same documents that are now shaking the U.S. embassies in the world and they are giving - according to commentators - a fatal blow to the diplomacy of the third millennium.
will. To us it seems that when the fatal blow to journalism are showing. Once again, not journalism leans to the verification of sources, but the clamor of an alleged news. For suppose that the documents are really the bomb, this means that they are undeniable truth? No. It should not be so. Sources should be checked, from which to look at how we are going really matters.
Instead of the tissue journalism, thinks that a document itself has the status of truth. First were the prosecutors, are now the sites of espionage. But just going and doing well, where we will end? And where the information will end? To think of it, how easy it is for irony, you should question what has become today the profession of journalist. The budget may not be very positive.
Source: The Fund Magazine
0 comments:
Post a Comment